Home
 
 
21 April 2008 @ 02:24 pm
stud hand analysis  
This hand is very cool because hugely important stuff happens on every street.  The key to the hand is figuring out where we are on fifth.  To do that, we'll have to start with third.  D.O. is enormously unlikely to have queens in this spot, having just called on third with the whole world behind him and of course, given the dead queen.  Possible starting hands for him include three flushes, a small pair in the hole and high cards.  First--I'll throw it out there that if he's going to play a small wired pair, I believe he's more likely to raise with it.   With a dead Q and dead J behind, he'll drive out other small pairs and straighty hands.  Since we're early to act, he may opt to just dump the small wired pairs as well.
Now--let's look at the texture of high cards he'd play.  David is a very strong, very observant player--NOT a guy we can expect to ignore board cards.  I think he's rather unlikely to have a straighty hand like QT9, KQT, AQT etc, given the 2 and likely 3 dead jacks.  I suspect that his range here consists largely of 3 flushes and almost precisely, the occasional AKQ (although I'd expect a reraise here frequently, as well).

Things start to crumble for me on 4th as DB catches a flushy card and bets, the chuft-monster catches a flushy and straighty card and calls, and I catch a slightly deadened 7 (marginally adding to the conviction that DB has a flush draw).  But hey, I probably have the best hand now, and the 7 scares up my board slightly since if I started with a 3 to a straight, it improves me.  I definitely don't want much action to go in on this street against 2 good looking drawing hands and 3 cards to come, so keeping the pot small and catching well on 5th is the plan. 

Now we get to the crux of the hand.  D.O. pairs his door and folds DB--this is good.  Chufty calls, so he's either got a flush draw or a straight draw with a pair.   On 5th, I make a very helpful 2 pair, since the 8 is straighty and continues to scare up my board.  As Grapes posted in the comments of the previous post, I'd be much happier acting immediately after D.O. and trying to raise out Chufty.  Oh well.  From our 3rd street analysis, it seems that the only way D.O. should have 2 pair now is if he has precisely the 5h in the hole--which is pretty much my worst case scenario.  I opt to raise for a few reasons:  1) If the hands are as I suspect, I have the best hand now and am a slight favorite over each of them.  Chufty is clearly drawing and not there yet (for one, i think he'd raise.  I also doubt he'd start with 653 or A35 unless he also had the Ad, in which case he'd probably put more action in multiway on 3rd anyway, so he most likely started with 543 and now has a pair and straight draw or a flush draw).  My raise is for thin value and to put pressure on both of my opponents.  D.O. almost certainly won't reraise even if he has 2 pair here, since I've raised his paired door and there is a guy who is clearly drawing to beat him with 2 to come--and chufty has to worry that his straight draw is no good even if he makes it.  With D.O.'s paired board, I also now have position for the rest of the hand.  If I elect to just call his fifth street bet, with two pair, he'll lead 6th and will likely lead the river.  This way, he'll check to me on both streets and I can just take the river showdown, as well as squeeze a little more value out of chufty in the meantime.  Not to mention that . . .

When I catch the 9 on 6th, my J-9-8-7 board is now very scary a chufty straight draw given my 5th street raise, less scary to D.O. and a chufty flush draw, despite my opponents each catching kill cards.  The bet here is clear because now chufty might finally fold (yay! I guess we know what he had) and D.O. can't raise me.  Additionally, given our 3rd street analysis and Chufty catching a T, the T is marginally less-likely to pair D.O. 

Highlight below for results.


*** SHOW DOWN ***
Hoss_TBF shows [Ks Jd Js 7h 8d 9s 8c] two pair, Jacks and Eights
David Oppenheim mucks
Hoss_TBF wins the pot ($25,197) with two pair, Jacks and Eights
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $25,200 | Rake $3
Seat 1: Hoss_TBF showed [Ks Jd Js 7h 8d 9s 8c] and won ($25,197) with two pair, Jacks and Eights
Seat 2: David Oppenheim mucked [Ah Kh Qh 5s Qc Tc 4d] - a pair of Queens
 
 
( 11 comments — Post a new comment )
Sabyl[info]sabyl on April 22nd, 2008 04:00 am (UTC)
Good reading. I would have given DO 2 pair as a more likely possibility than you did. Like I said in my comment, there are reasons I am not playing this game. Very impressive raise on 5th.
(Anonymous) on April 22nd, 2008 04:29 am (UTC)
So showing the results in that order is the actual order of his cards or the scrambled FTP version? I would be amazed if he started with AKQh and didn't complete on 3rd.
Hoss_TBF[info]hoss_tbf on April 22nd, 2008 05:51 am (UTC)
It's the scrambled FTP version but I'm pretty sure it's the correct order. I completed and he just called with Ah Kh Qh.
(Anonymous) on April 22nd, 2008 01:30 pm (UTC)
Oh right, I misread the original hand conversion. Would you normally raise the completion in D.O's spot? His A's and K's are live with one J, no 10's, and one heart showing. Your analysis of the hand was spot on though. I guess that's why you are playing (and hopefully winning) at 1k/2k!
yarffaJ nalA[info]jnala on April 22nd, 2008 04:18 pm (UTC)
Well, if you can definitively rule out two pair for DO based on his failure to reraise third, then I understand the raise on fifth. But are you really sure about that read?

Basically, I'm surprised that you think a good player would be that transparent. Is there enough value in reraising pairs and flat-calling nonpairs that it's worth giving up so much information, absolutely denying a pair with his action on third?

Given that the raise gives up a lot more value when you're behind than it gains when you're ahead, and that low wired pairs are a priori more likely than AKQ or playable hearts (assuming he'd fold queen-rag-rag of hearts on third), you gotta be really sure of your read for the raise to be right for value. If you are, hey, more power to you.

I still don't understand chufty's fold on sixth. J987 is a lot less scary when there are two tens out, and nothing about your play suggests a ten. I'd think he'd have a call with a straight draw even if the tens weren't dead, given the pot odds, and with the dead tens it's automatic. You weren't shocked when he folded?

So yeah, I didn't assign much value to the "pressure" aspect of the raise, but if it gets chufty to fold when you catch a ten or nine, that's something... I just wouldn't have expected that.
Hoss_TBF[info]hoss_tbf on April 22nd, 2008 05:06 pm (UTC)
A big point you are missing is that he is not reraising with 2 pair here and he almost certainly doesn't have trips, so when I check the river behind, I put the same number of bets in as if I had just called and called again when he bet out the river. Putting the raise in on fifth makes chufty put more money in the pot and gets the money in when I'm more likely to be ahead. If DO continues leading and they both check to me on the river, I can't bet my 2 pair--I cant even bet it if Chufty still folds on sixth. All this means that when I am ahead and just call fifth, I win a smaller pot. I didn't think the chances of chufty folding were huge, but I certainly thought there was some chance. Chufty, IMO, is not an observant player--I wouldn't be surprised if he completely ignored board cards. My guess is that what he sees is one guy pair his door, and another guy raise him and then thinks, "wow, my wheel draw is not so hot anymore." However much value you assign to the "pressure" aspect of the raise, realize that the pot is going to stay the same size (or even be slightly larger when I win) so the pressure doesn't cost anything.

Much less important, but I think the very nature of me opening with a J suggests I *could* have a T, despite it being less likely because of the 2 dead Qs and dead 7). I probably would open JT9 in that spot, fwiw. It becomes more likely when I catch straighty cards and continue to put more action in the hand.
Sabyl[info]sabyl on April 23rd, 2008 01:00 am (UTC)
I think I get this in that the key here is you are definitely getting position on 6th since DO has open Queens. I guess this is vital to the play. You can choose to put more money in on 6th if you wish. If bet into on 6th you can choose to call or raise, and if you aren't bet into you can choose to bet or check. Same with 7th. Which you mention in your post.

I guess what made you so sure he wouldn't 3 bet you on 5th? I guess on some level a 3 bet by him is not such a good play as he is out of position for the rest of the hand. But I would expect some if his range to include a 3 bet on 5th - no?
yarffaJ nalA[info]jnala on April 23rd, 2008 11:07 pm (UTC)
Can DO bet two pair on the river in the usual case where chufty stays in on sixth? I wouldn't expect him to, in which case the raise on fifth does make your investment in the pot larger...
Hoss_TBF[info]hoss_tbf on April 24th, 2008 04:32 pm (UTC)
That's a fair point. I wouldn't expect him to bet against two drawing hands, but against one drawing hand and one presumed made hand, I would expect a bet. You're right that we can't give a bet 100% probability on this river, but I think it's still pretty high. Chufty is between 3:1 and 4:1 to make his draw, in which case he still mightn't raise (fright of DO already being ahead combined with wanting to get an overcall from me), and I am probably calling all the time when chufty folds.
joepro[info]joepro on April 23rd, 2008 04:22 pm (UTC)
Best. Post. Ever. Wow, thank you so much for this. I really mean that. This stuff is priceless to a guy like me, I often watch you play on ftp and stars, and I wonder what a lot of the thinking is on each street.

One question, I always wondered how guys can multitable high limit mixed games, primarily stud variants, because if they blink, they miss the dead cards. Can you comment on this? Thanks.
(Anonymous) on April 24th, 2008 03:07 pm (UTC)
Thank you for sharing your analysis with us. It is very interesting and beneficial, especially as I have only recently taken to playing stud variations.

The grim part of me retains a morbid curiosilty in your running badly.

All the best